MSU Board Removes ‘Diversity’ from VP’s Title Amidst National Trend
In a landmark decision influenced by national shifts, the Michigan State University Board of Trustees voted on Friday, October 31, 2025, to revise the title of its top Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) administrator. Jabbar Bennett, who previously held the title of Vice President and Diversity Officer, is now designated as Vice President and Chief Inclusion Officer. This move reflects a broader national response stimulated by federal pressures to rethink diversity initiatives.
Contextualizing the Change
This development at Michigan State University (MSU) corresponds with the Trump Administration’s ongoing efforts to assess and potentially dismantle DEI programs nationwide, criticisms of which argue these initiatives are inconsistent with meritocratic values. These federal directives come with the threat of investigations and funding cuts, which have left universities like MSU grappling with compliance.
Trustee Rema Vassar strongly opposed the title change, expressing her concerns about succumbing to external forces. “I do not agree that we should capitulate to pressure around language changes,” Vassar asserted. Echoing this sentiment, Trustee Dennis Denno abstained from the vote after expressing discomfort with distancing from the term “diversity.”
In contrast, Trustee Renee Knake Jefferson emphasized the decision was aligned with administrative recommendations, reassuring stakeholders that the DEI work’s essence and goals would remain unchanged. “The work we do will not change, and the work will remain,” Jefferson stated.
Community Reaction and Its Local Impact
The alteration sparked frustration among certain community factions, particularly the Black Students’ Alliance. Political Affairs Director Nicashia Phillips criticized the decision as regressive during the public comment period of the board meeting. “It is regression, and it sends the message to every marginalized student that our belonging here is conditional,” Phillips articulated.
For residents and students of the East Lansing community, this decision carries significant implications. Many fear it undermines decades of progress in fostering a campus environment ripe with diversity and inclusivity. Kathryn Harding, President of the Associated Students of Michigan State University, criticized the abrupt nature of such changes imposed on student organizations without ample notice.
MSU’s decision is not an isolated adjustment. Prior actions taken by the university in compliance with these federal pressures included the removal of DEI language from strategic documents and a shift in student organization mission statements. The Office of Institutional Diversity and Inclusion’s renaming to the Office for Inclusive Excellence and Impact further signifies MSU’s approach to aligning with federal guidelines while attempting to preserve its core values.
Looking Beyond: Potential Implications
While local impact is undeniable, this alteration could signal a more expansive shift within higher education nationwide. By capitulating to federal decrees even while asserting continued commitment to DEI, MSU’s decision might serve as a template for other institutions navigating these uncertainties.
Despite compliance, opponents like Trustee Vassar argue that the core principles related to shared governance and equality remain in jeopardy. Vassar questioned the sustainability of an institution reliant on language adjustments that prioritize compliance over core educational integrity and inclusiveness.
Dr. Henry Mochida, MSU’s Inclusion Communications Manager, reconfirmed the university’s commitment to its mission as it navigates the evolving federal landscape. “As the university continues to navigate various federal impacts, we remain committed to upholding our mission and values while ensuring compliance with government regulations through equal opportunities in education, research, and outreach for all Spartans,” he said.
Continuing the Dialogue
A greater dialogue is imperative as universities confront these policy-induced challenges. By engaging varied stakeholders and holding forums, MSU and similar institutions can foster a path forward, mitigating tensions and creating platforms for future DEI endeavors.
For those within the university community seeking greater insight into these transitions, MSU is expected to host open sessions, fostering discussions on resolving concerns while navigating the complexities of higher education amidst federal influence.
In conclusion, while MSU’s alteration in title may seem superficial, it is reflective of a deeper, more challenging struggle faced by university administrations. A balance between compliance and steadfastness in equity values remains crucial. Moving forward, this development casts light on a broader conversation essential for reaffirming institutions’ commitment to making every student feel recognized and valued.
